-<!-- $Id: book.xml,v 1.28 2006-04-30 07:07:12 adam Exp $ -->
+<!-- $Id: book.xml,v 1.30 2006-05-03 14:56:07 mike Exp $ -->
<bookinfo>
<title>Metaproxy - User's Guide and Reference</title>
<author>
>the HTTP 1.1 specification</ulink>.
</para>
<para>
- The role of the <literal>virt_db</literal> filter is to rewrite
- this otherInfo packet dependent on the virtual database that the
- client wants to search.
+ Within Metaproxy, Search requests that are part of the same
+ session as an Init request that carries a
+ <literal>VAL_PROXY</literal> otherInfo are also annotated with the
+ same information. The role of the <literal>virt_db</literal>
+ filter is to rewrite this otherInfo packet dependent on the
+ virtual database that the client wants to search.
</para>
<para>
When Metaproxy receives a Z39.50 Init request from a client, it
doesn't immediately forward that request to the back-end server.
Why not? Because it doesn't know <emphasis>which</emphasis>
- back-end server to forward it to until the client sends a search
+ back-end server to forward it to until the client sends a Search
request that specifies the database that it wants to search in.
Instead, it just treasures the Init request up in its heart; and,
later, the first time the client does a search on one of the
through it.
</para>
<para>
- ### Describe the use of multiple <literal>VAL_PROXY</literal>
- otherInfos, added by <literal>virt_db</literal> and used by
- <literal>multi</literal>.
+ It is possible for a <literal>virt_db</literal> filter to contain
+ multiple
+ <literal><target></literal>
+ elements. What does this mean? Only that the filter will add
+ multiple <literal>VAL_PROXY</literal> otherInfo packets to the
+ Search requests that pass through it. That's because the virtual
+ DB filter is dumb, and does exactly what it's told - no more, no
+ less.
+ If a Search request with multiple <literal>VAL_PROXY</literal>
+ otherInfo packets reaches a <literal>z3950_client</literal>
+ filter, this is an error. That filter doesn't know how to deal
+ with multiple targets, so it will either just pick one and search
+ in it, or (better) fail with an error message.
+ </para>
+ <para>
+ The <literal>multi</literal> filter comes to the rescue! This is
+ the only filter that knows how to deal with multiple
+ <literal>VAL_PROXY</literal> otherInfo packets, and it does so by
+ making multiple copies of the entire Search request: one for each
+ <literal>VAL_PROXY</literal>. Each of these new copies is then
+ passed down through the remaining filters in the route. (The
+ copies are handled in parallel though the
+ spawning of new threads.) Since the copies each have only one
+ <literal>VAL_PROXY</literal> otherInfo, they can be handled by the
+ <literal>z3950_client</literal> filter, which happily deals with
+ each one individually. When the results of the individual
+ searches come back up to the <literal>multi</literal> filter, it
+ merges them into a single Search response, which is what
+ eventually makes it back to the client.
</para>
</section>