-<!-- $Id: book.xml,v 1.11 2006-04-21 17:08:12 mike Exp $ -->
+<!-- $Id: book.xml,v 1.12 2006-04-21 21:35:24 mike Exp $ -->
<bookinfo>
<title>Metaproxy - User's Guide and Reference</title>
<author>
facilitites the creation of pluggable modules implementing further
functionality.
</para>
+ <para>
+ This manual will briefly describe Metaproxy's licensing situation
+ before giving an overview of its architecture, then discussing the
+ key concept of a filter in some depth and giving an overview of
+ the various filter types, then discussing the configuration file
+ format. After this come several optional chapters which may be
+ freely skipped: a detailed discussion of virtual databases and
+ multi-database searching, some notes on writing extensions
+ (additional filter types) and a high-level description of the
+ source code. Finally comes the reference guide, which contains
+ instructions for invoking the <command>metaproxy</command>
+ program, and detailed information on each type of filter,
+ including examples.
+ </para>
</chapter>
<section>
<title>Introductory notes</title>
+ <warning>
+ <title>Lark's vomit</title>
+ <para>
+ This chapter goes into a level of technical detail that is
+ probably not necessary in order to configure and use Metaproxy.
+ It is provided only for those who like to know how things work.
+ You should feel free to skip on to the next section if this one
+ doesn't seem like fun.
+ </para>
+ </warning>
<para>
Two of Metaproxy's filters are concerned with multiple-database
operations. Of these, <literal>virt_db</literal> can work alone
while <literal>multi</literal> can work with the output of
<literal>virt_db</literal> to perform multicast searching, merging
the results into a unified result-set. The interaction between
- these two filters is necessarily complex, reflecting the real
- complexity of multicast searching in a protocol such as Z39.50
- that separates initialisation from searching, with the database to
- search known only during the latter operation.
+ these two filters is necessarily complex: it reflecting the real,
+ irreducible complexity of multicast searching in a protocol such
+ as Z39.50 that separates initialisation from searching, and in
+ which the database to be searched is not known at initialisation
+ time.
+ </para>
+ <para>
+ Hold on tight - this may get a little hairy.
</para>
<para>
In the general course of things, a Z39.50 Init request may carry
with it an otherInfo packet of type <literal>VAL_PROXY</literal>,
whose value indicates the address of a Z39.50 server to which the
ultimate connection is to be made. (This otherInfo packet is
- supported by YAZ-based Z39.50 servers and clients, but has not yet
+ supported by YAZ-based Z39.50 clients and servers, but has not yet
been ratified by the Maintenance Agency and so is not widely used
in non-Index Data software. We're working on it.)
The <literal>VAL_PROXY</literal> packet functions
<ulink url="http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616.html"
>the HTTP 1.1 specification</ulink>.
</para>
+ <para>
+ The role of the <literal>virt_db</literal> filter is to rewrite
+ this otherInfo packet dependent on the virtual database that the
+ client wants to search. For example, a <literal>virt_db</literal>
+ filter could be set up so that searches in the virtual database
+ ``lc'' are forwarded to the Library of Congress server, and
+ searches in the virtual database ``id'' are forwarded to the toy
+ GILS database that Index Data hosts for testing purposes. A
+ <literal>virt_db</literal> configuration to make this switch would
+ look like this:
+ </para>
+ <screen><![CDATA[
+ <filter type="virt_db">
+ <virtual>
+ <database>lc</database>
+ <target>z3950.loc.gov:7090/Voyager</target>
+ </virtual>
+ <virtual>
+ <database>id</database>
+ <target>indexdata.dk/gils</target>
+ </virtual>
+ </filter>]]></screen>
+ <para>
+ When Metaproxy receives a Z39.50 Init request from a client, it
+ doesn't immediately forward that request to the back-end server.
+ Why not? Because it doesn't know <emphasis>which</emphasis>
+ back-end server to forward it to until the client sends a search
+ request that specifies the database that it wants to search in.
+ Instead, it just treasures the Init request up in its heart; and,
+ later, the first time the client does a search on one of the
+ specified virtual databases, a connection is forged to the
+ appropriate server and the Init request is forwarded to it. If,
+ later in the session, the same client searches in a different
+ virtual database, then a connection is forged to the server that
+ hosts it, and the same cached Init request is forwarded there,
+ too.
+ </para>
+ <para>
+ All of this clever Init-delaying is done by the
+ <literal>frontend_net</literal> filter. The
+ <literal>virt_db</literal> filter knows nothing about it; in
+ fact, because the Init request that is received from the client
+ doesn't get forwarded until a Search reqeust is received, the
+ <literal>virt_db</literal> filter (and the
+ <literal>z3950_client</literal> filter behind it) doesn't even get
+ invoked at Init time. The <emphasis>only</emphasis> thing that a
+ <literal>virt_db</literal> filter ever does is rewrite the
+ <literal>VAL_PROXY</literal> otherInfo in the requests that pass
+ through it.
+ </para>
</section>
</chapter>